Ombudsman Sees Continued Restriction of Freedom of Assembly in Armenia

YEREVAN (RFE/RL)–Armenia’s human rights defender has criticized the authorities for failing to show full commitment to the principles of freedom of assembly. In an ad hoc report unveiled in Yerevan on Tuesday, Ombudsman Armen Harutiunian also blamed certain vague provisions in the current legislation for the situation.

The report reviews the situation with the freedom of assembly in Armenia since the 2008 presidential election till today. It concludes that the principles of “state obligation to protect peaceful rallies, exclusion of discrimination and other principles” have been violated.

“The conduct of public authorities in many cases gives reasons to assume that they fail to fully appreciate the importance of freedom of assembly,” Harutiunian said during the presentation of the report.

According to the data published in the report, the Yerevan authorities rejected more than 80 requests for holding public rallies in the city in 2008.

“There were not that many requests for public rallies in 2009 and particularly so far this year and the number of rejections isn’t that large correspondingly, because it is not a pre-election period now. The same problems, however, may recur during pre-election periods, as the legislation remains the same,” he said.

The Armenian parliament introduced drastic changes in the freedom of assembly legislation shortly after nonstop rallies staged by the opposition after the disputed 2008 presidential election led to the country’s worst political crisis. The changes severely restricted the rights to hold rallies and demonstrations and gave local authorities sweeping powers to reject requests for holding protest events based on vague conclusions of law-enforcement agencies. The Armenian lawmakers later removed some of the restrictions under pressure from the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, but did not fully revert to the version of the law that existed before March 2008.

The ombudsman’s latest report does not refer to cases of violence, police detentions and criminal prosecution applied against oppositionists participating in marches of protest in 2009. It only says that citizens’ right to hold marches appeared to be ‘less protected’ than the right to stage rallies.

Harutiunian said he planned to come up with a new draft law to try to fill in the gaps in the existing legislation.

The ombudsman acknowledged the existence of violations in the practice of applying laws, but would not be drawn into a discussion of the ‘democratic credentials’ of the current government.

“An ombudsman is not a politician and this is not a political report,” Harutiunian underscored.


Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.


  1. Araxi said:

    This man is Armenian only by name. He is an alien spy and has been working for an unseen enemy in Armenia for many years. I don’t understand who elects an Ombudsman in Armenia and who sacks the Ombudsman.
    Հասատանը տեր ունի՞ թե ոչ՞: Ըստ երևույթին Հայաստանը ղեկավարվում է օտար մի քանի պետությունների կողմից որոնք կարողացել են իրենց կադրերին խծկել պետության տարբեր շերտերի մեջ: Who is going to sort this out? These questions as well as opening of different schools in Armenia are AAA priority. Perhaps more urgent than Հայ դատ. What is ARF doing about this?

  2. Araxi said:

    It is very much a political issue and a very important one too A. Haruiunian. It is a grass roots issue for the Armenian nation as a whole. Stop showing you are working for Armenia and Armenians because you are not.