Constitutional Court Failed to Elect New Chair

Armenia's Constitutional Court was unable to elect Yervand Khundkaryan as its chairman
Armenia's Constitutional Court was unable to elect Yervand Khundkaryan as its chairman

Armenia’s Constitutional Court was unable to elect Yervand Khundkaryan as its chairman

YEREVAN (—After three days of discussions, members of Armenia’s Constitutional Court failed to elect its new chairperson on Friday.

The position has been vacant ever since the Armenian parliament enacted in June controversial constitutional amendments initiated by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.

The amendments call for the gradual resignation of seven of the court’s nine judges locked in a standoff with Pashinyan’s political team. Three of them had to resign with immediate effect. The constitutional amendments also required Hrayr Tovmasyan to quit as court chairman but remain a judge.

Tovmasyan and the ousted judges consider their removal illegal and politically motivated. They have appealed to the European Court of Human Rights to have them reinstated.

This did not stop the parliament controlled by Pashinyan’s My Step bloc from electing three new court judges earlier this month. One of them, Yervand Khundkaryan, was the only candidate nominated for the post of court chairman.

The nine justices spent three days discussing practical modalities of the election and Khundkaryan’s candidacy. One of them, Edgar Shatiryan, told reporters afterwards that Khundkaryan failed to garner at least five votes needed for succeeding Tovmasyan as court chairman. He said he and his colleagues will meet on Monday to start the election process anew.

Shatiryan did not confirm or deny news reports saying that only three judges backed Khundkaryan’s appointment and that the six others voted against him or did not vote at all.

Another judge, Vahe Grigoryan, openly voiced his opposition to the nominee when he spoke to journalists ahead of the vote.

Grigoryan was appointed to the Constitutional Court one year after the 2018 “Velvet Revolution” that brought Pashinyan to power. He was at odds with Tovmasyan and six other court members installed by former Armenian governments.

Despite challenging the legality of his ouster, Tovmasyan took part in the discussions on the new court chair held behind the closed doors. He insisted on Thursday that there is no contradiction between his participation and rejection of the constitutional changes.

“I will continue to fight until constitutionality in Armenia on this issue is restored,” said the former chief justice. “I don’t know when I will succeed, but I will keep fighting.”

Tovmasyan also said that he will not take part in Friday’s vote because he believes the Armenian authorities have made sure that Khundkaryan’s election is a forgone conclusion. But he claimed the following morning that the authorities are now also considering “other scenarios” as well.

Khundkaryan headed the Court of Cassation, Armenia’s highest body of criminal and administrative justice, until the National Assembly approved his appointment to one of the vacant Constitutional Court seats. He was nominated by a national convention of judges held in August.

Several Armenian civic groups have strongly criticized Khundkaryan’s appointment, saying that it will not address what Pashinyan has repeatedly described as a lack of public trust in the Constitutional Court.

The critics argue that the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled against Armenia in connection with several verdicts handed down by Khundkaryan in the past. In particular, the Strasbourg-based court ordered the authorities in Yerevan in 2008 to compensate the independent TV station A1+ controversially pulled off the air in 2002.
Pashinyan strongly defended on September 16 the choice of Khundkaryan and the two other new judges. He said that their critics are primarily concerned with their own parochial interests, rather than the rule of law.

Meanwhile, representatives of the two parliamentary opposition parties reiterated that they believe the recent constitutional changes were enacted in breach of other articles of the Armenian constitution.


Discussion Policy

Comments are welcomed and encouraged. Though you are fully responsible for the content you post, comments that include profanity, personal attacks or other inappropriate material will not be permitted. Asbarez reserves the right to block users who violate any of our posting standards and policies.